yes, now that you mention it, i think i did see one. overall though, it's been pretty good, i think.Pandemonium wrote:Er... there's a couple recent threads (that coincidently feature lots of posts by six7six7) that you may want to avoid.Artemis wrote:i didn't mind the thread about not fucking up the forums. i expressed my serious dislike for the use of 'retard' in a derogatory way, and thus far, nobody has been using it. not that i've noticed anyway...
The Official Xiola.org review
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i think i said something about not going full retard. It's a movie line. If we can't quote movies, then i quit.Artemis wrote:yes, now that you mention it, i think i did see one. overall though, it's been pretty good, i think.Pandemonium wrote:Er... there's a couple recent threads (that coincidently feature lots of posts by six7six7) that you may want to avoid.Artemis wrote:i didn't mind the thread about not fucking up the forums. i expressed my serious dislike for the use of 'retard' in a derogatory way, and thus far, nobody has been using it. not that i've noticed anyway...
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
As the person who started this thread, i would like to request that it's locked.
I'm tired of giving the former owner of xiola.org a place to continue to talk about himself. He can use his tumblr for that.
I'm tired of giving the former owner of xiola.org a place to continue to talk about himself. He can use his tumblr for that.
- Pandemonium
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
There you go, going full...... eh, tilt again.Six7Six7 wrote:As the person who started this thread, i would like to request that it's locked.
I'm tired of giving the former owner of xiola.org a place to continue to talk about himself. He can use his tumblr for that.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
This was never rule by committee. We had a talk like friends/adults, and everyone got a feel for the opinions of everyone else. We've voluntarily been good neighbors to each other. The two people who were banned came in with the express purpose of hyper-trolling the board. It wasn't a judgment call to ban them, it was a no-brainer, and their own endgame.
Also, unless I'm reading it wrong, or missed part (because I only skimmed) the stuff sonny seems to be saying makes this place more like ja.org is pretty close to or the same as the 90% of things he disagreed with on xiola. Maybe not. I'm not speaking for him, and I'd sooner try to touch the moon than take on sonny's thought process. The Etty thread was moved into the Animals section because that's where it belongs, and everyone agreed. It wasn't about JA or music, it was about making fun of a relative of someone in JA. It certainly wasn't any kind of discussion about Etty's effect on the sonic direction of the band.
In any case, this place has run excellently in its short life, and nobody has been forced to do anything. If anyone from xiola (aside from sonny) feels that their rights have been trampled here, it would be very interesting to hear from them.
Also, unless I'm reading it wrong, or missed part (because I only skimmed) the stuff sonny seems to be saying makes this place more like ja.org is pretty close to or the same as the 90% of things he disagreed with on xiola. Maybe not. I'm not speaking for him, and I'd sooner try to touch the moon than take on sonny's thought process. The Etty thread was moved into the Animals section because that's where it belongs, and everyone agreed. It wasn't about JA or music, it was about making fun of a relative of someone in JA. It certainly wasn't any kind of discussion about Etty's effect on the sonic direction of the band.
In any case, this place has run excellently in its short life, and nobody has been forced to do anything. If anyone from xiola (aside from sonny) feels that their rights have been trampled here, it would be very interesting to hear from them.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
This head movies makes my eyes rain.Pandemonium wrote:There you go, going full...... eh, tilt again.Six7Six7 wrote:As the person who started this thread, i would like to request that it's locked.
I'm tired of giving the former owner of xiola.org a place to continue to talk about himself. He can use his tumblr for that.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i disagreekv wrote:funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
Jasper summed it all up nicely.Jasper wrote:This was never rule by committee. We had a talk like friends/adults, and everyone got a feel for the opinions of everyone else. We've voluntarily been good neighbors to each other. The two people who were banned came in with the express purpose of hyper-trolling the board. It wasn't a judgment call to ban them, it was a no-brainer, and their own endgame.
Also, unless I'm reading it wrong, or missed part (because I only skimmed) the stuff sonny seems to be saying makes this place more like ja.org is pretty close to or the same as the 90% of things he disagreed with on xiola. Maybe not. I'm not speaking for him, and I'd sooner try to touch the moon than take on sonny's thought process. The Etty thread was moved into the Animals section because that's where it belongs, and everyone agreed. It wasn't about JA or music, it was about making fun of a relative of someone in JA. It certainly wasn't any kind of discussion about Etty's effect on the sonic direction of the band.
In any case, this place has run excellently in its short life, and nobody has been forced to do anything. If anyone from xiola (aside from sonny) feels that their rights have been trampled here, it would be very interesting to hear from them.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
Yeah but you're the same dude who completely deletes entire websites because you get sad.sonny wrote:i disagreekv wrote:funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
You're not exactly the most stable of people to be making any sort of logical decisions about anything.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
play fucking nice..we wouldn't even be here today if not for sonny...fact respect that...don't take the gloves off because you can now without repercussionsSix7Six7 wrote:Yeah but you're the same dude who completely deletes entire websites because you get sad.sonny wrote:i disagreekv wrote:funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
You're not exactly the most stable of people to be making any sort of logical decisions about anything.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i think it's more about people liking the new album.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
maybe sonny is right after all.kv wrote:play fucking nice..we wouldn't even be here today if not for sonny...fact respect that...don't take the gloves off because you can now without repercussionsSix7Six7 wrote:Yeah but you're the same dude who completely deletes entire websites because you get sad.sonny wrote:i disagreekv wrote:funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
You're not exactly the most stable of people to be making any sort of logical decisions about anything.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
we and everyone, are what rule by committee is.Jasper wrote:This was never rule by committee. We had a talk like friends/adults, and everyone got a feel for the opinions of everyone else. We've voluntarily been good neighbors to each other. The two people who were banned came in with the express purpose of hyper-trolling the board. It wasn't a judgment call to ban them, it was a no-brainer, and their own endgame.
Also, unless I'm reading it wrong, or missed part (because I only skimmed) the stuff sonny seems to be saying makes this place more like ja.org is pretty close to or the same as the 90% of things he disagreed with on xiola. Maybe not. I'm not speaking for him, and I'd sooner try to touch the moon than take on sonny's thought process. The Etty thread was moved into the Animals section because that's where it belongs, and everyone agreed. It wasn't about JA or music, it was about making fun of a relative of someone in JA. It certainly wasn't any kind of discussion about Etty's effect on the sonic direction of the band.
In any case, this place has run excellently in its short life, and nobody has been forced to do anything. If anyone from xiola (aside from sonny) feels that their rights have been trampled here, it would be very interesting to hear from them.
we decided to do this or everyone thought... those equal committee to me.
i won't argue bans, because i made the call i thought was right and i always gave second chances. i'm not sure how many i banned the first two months i was running the site, but maybe we should make more comparisons, say 5 years from now, k?
i think the general shout downs of people who dislike the new album or declaring people as haters that should be banned or threads should be locked or you shouldn't be here if you don't like perry farrell now. all sounds very much like ja.org
either way, just my own opinion. i realize the tide has turned and people feel this place is better or equal to what they had at xiola.org.
me, i disagree.
it's a message board and it's run by hoka like hoka sees fit. he obviously values opinions and goes with the flow there.
there more i say, the deeper i seem to dig shit. i'm sure hoka will tell i'm full of shit, since i mentioned his name here.
as for rights trampled, yr words, not mine. and not at all what i was saying. it's just a different way to run things and as creep said, i wouldn't want hoka to just copy the way i run things.
my thought process is relatively normal. once a dozen people interpret a dozen ways, it gets a little tough to stay on topic and sufficiently defend what i'm saying or did at xiola.org.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
lol ok fine fuck you creep fuck you sony fuck you 6767...wee feels like xiola now...
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
you misrepresented what happened. if that makes it easier to insult me, then ok.Six7Six7 wrote:Yeah but you're the same dude who completely deletes entire websites because you get sad.sonny wrote:i disagreekv wrote:funny this place feels a lot like xiola to me and nothing like ja.com
You're not exactly the most stable of people to be making any sort of logical decisions about anything.
it's not uncommon for the kettle to call the pot black, it's actually very common for some.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
never a troll hang out. ja.org and anr.com, were both a troll hang out at one point, but NEVER xiola.org. wouldn't allow such shit, not would i ask if it's ok from a committee.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i think the general shout downs of people who dislike the new album or declaring people as haters that should be banned or threads should be locked or you shouldn't be here if you don't like perry farrell now. all sounds very much like ja.org
dude please that exact shit happened all the time at xiola
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i actually think more people here dislike the album, they just aren't heard from as much. they don't want to shit on other people's enjoyment, or they don't feel the need to post negatively.creep wrote:i think it's more about people liking the new album.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i may be mixing things up...wasn't that hello kitty period xiola.org under new management?sonny wrote:never a troll hang out. ja.org and anr.com, were both a troll hang out at one point, but NEVER xiola.org. wouldn't allow such shit, not would i ask if it's ok from a committee.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
bull fucking shit it wasn't...at the start it was pretty much just the trolls that posted thre me adolf miggy sgb et all..the whole whores crowd...everyone else posted at 1% remember then when you'd post at whores and have fun?sonny wrote:
never a troll hang out. ja.org and anr.com, were both a troll hang out at one point, but NEVER xiola.org. wouldn't allow such shit, not would i ask if it's ok from a committee.
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
i think generally i tried to squash such bullshit, but i can accept that you saw it differently, and i didn't read everything, so maybe it went on more. not that i read everything here either.kv wrote:i think the general shout downs of people who dislike the new album or declaring people as haters that should be banned or threads should be locked or you shouldn't be here if you don't like perry farrell now. all sounds very much like ja.org
dude please that exact shit happened all the time at xiola
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
fact...whats wrong with not wanting to rain on the parade? i did it for strays tons...i didn't expect as much from them this time so i wasn't as bummed...prob like everyone else who doesn't like the new recordsonny wrote:i actually think more people here dislike the album, they just aren't heard from as much. they don't want to shit on other people's enjoyment, or they don't feel the need to post negatively.creep wrote:i think it's more about people liking the new album.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand
Re: The Official Xiola.org review
see, that was ja.org. never xiola.org. erik is not likely gonna speak on my behalf here, but i never put goofy themes on my forum.Artemis wrote:i may be mixing things up...wasn't that hello kitty period xiola.org under new management?sonny wrote:never a troll hang out. ja.org and anr.com, were both a troll hang out at one point, but NEVER xiola.org. wouldn't allow such shit, not would i ask if it's ok from a committee.kv wrote:i think when sonny compares us to ja and not xiola he is comparing us to his vision of what he wanted xiola to be not what it actually was
and xiola was many different things things over the course of its life..it was a troll hang out...an escape from 1%...the counter point...the main point...it changed a lot over the years i think sonnys view of xiola is very much idealized.....which i can understand