Only those who buy a ticket.mockbee wrote:yeah, sounds like perry is cool with it.
wouldn't that make us the fools.
"Cash in now, baby! Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh..."
Only those who buy a ticket.mockbee wrote:yeah, sounds like perry is cool with it.
wouldn't that make us the fools.
Cos they can't be fucked learning it?.....erotic cheeses wrote:Look I'm sorry but why is of course so difficult, it's not like range/lyrically it's difficult, is it?
You should. Last time Perry looked amazing.bman wrote:Voodoo festival on 10/31. This I may go to!
Nice to see they "properly" documented a performance of the original lineup with an official release from this show. Talk about embarrassing. Heaven forbid they release a long form video of the 1990 Palladium shows.Six7Six7 wrote:
Yes. I believe Perry even tried to get Eric on board with a stylist for the tour and Eric was having none of it.Six7Six7 wrote:Didn't Eric say, in Sonny's interview, that the sequins and the cape was basically Perry's "fuck you" to Eric after Eric asked him to tone down the camp and the karaoke Jane Says?
yes now it's like watching your accountant performing.bman wrote:Perry's clothing has completely normalized since 09. Thank God he no longer wears those liberace clothes.
phenobarb_bambalam wrote:
Nothing’s Shocking is one of those once heard, never forgotten albums that bands don’t even pretend to make anymore; easily on par with other titanic releases that came out of L.A. in the ’80s and early ’90s: Appetite For Destruction, Straight Outta Compton, Paul’s Boutique, and The Chronic. And yet, the Jane’s oeuvre and myth doesn’t feel aged, or classic. If anything, it’s still a live wire; dangerous and dark in spite of the passage of time. “My sex and my drugs and my rock n’ roll,” Perry Farrell sang back in 1990 on the Ritual De Lo Habitual album, “are the only things that keeps me here.” Two decades later there’s not one note of corniness or kitsch to Jane’s. While the band never said, “Hey kids, drugs are cool,” they made no apology for exulting in substances stronger than pot. Sex, as Jane’s portrayed it, was bold as well; a ritual, with candles lit, altars built, spirits stirred. It’s part of what bonded them to a devoted fan base and let’s face it, what kept them interesting.
Date
Sat, October 24, 2015
Time
8:30 PM
Doors
7:30 PM
On sale
Fri, Jun 26, 2015 10:00 AM
Ticket Prices*
$75.00 - $90.00
Day of Show $75.00-$90.00
They're taking the piss. Day tickets at the festival in Sacramento are cheaper than that!mockbee wrote:Date
Sat, October 24, 2015
Time
8:30 PM
Doors
7:30 PM
On sale
Fri, Jun 26, 2015 10:00 AM
Ticket Prices*
$75.00 - $90.00
Day of Show $75.00-$90.00
$75..... :imnotatruefan:
mockbee wrote:
http://www.thewarfieldtheatre.com/events/detail/279759
...................Two decades later there’s not one note of corniness or kitsch to Jane’s............................
Once computers entered every home by the late 90s, true music journalism with integrity died.mockbee wrote:mockbee wrote:
http://www.thewarfieldtheatre.com/events/detail/279759
...................Two decades later there’s not one note of corniness or kitsch to Jane’s............................
Are there like qualifications necessary for music industry journalists? Or is it just any dude off the street can be a writer?
$75+$75 = shitty concert for twobman wrote:I can't believe you guys are complaining about a $75 ticket. That's the going rate for a band like Jane's Addiction. The place will be full and They are actually a GREAT cover band! Ritual plus 3 others. Sure it's a short set but I bet there's no complaints. Only from people here of course. You can spend $75 easy for a shitty dinner for two in most cities.
I disagree. Still a damn good show most nights. These are classic songs man. Just go. Plenty of worse ways to spend $150.Tyler Durden wrote:$75+$75 = shitty concert for twobman wrote:I can't believe you guys are complaining about a $75 ticket. That's the going rate for a band like Jane's Addiction. The place will be full and They are actually a GREAT cover band! Ritual plus 3 others. Sure it's a short set but I bet there's no complaints. Only from people here of course. You can spend $75 easy for a shitty dinner for two in most cities.
Jane's is like that restaurant that used to be amazing...but one of the head chefs left and now the food kind of sucks...with a VERY limited menu.
Maybe saying "shitty" concert is taking it too far. But still...I've seen Chaney's Addiction a few times and I enjoyed myself. But Perry can't sing anymore and the "danger" of the band's youth is long gone. I'd rather hold on to the memories of the first incarnation than go watch them play 80% of Ritual along with "Superhero" and "Another Soulmate".bman wrote:I disagree. Still a damn good show most nights. These are classic songs man. Just go. Plenty of worse ways to spend $150.Tyler Durden wrote:$75+$75 = shitty concert for twobman wrote:I can't believe you guys are complaining about a $75 ticket. That's the going rate for a band like Jane's Addiction. The place will be full and They are actually a GREAT cover band! Ritual plus 3 others. Sure it's a short set but I bet there's no complaints. Only from people here of course. You can spend $75 easy for a shitty dinner for two in most cities.
Jane's is like that restaurant that used to be amazing...but one of the head chefs left and now the food kind of sucks...with a VERY limited menu.
Unless it's new material with Eric Avery as cowriter and bassist, I'm not interested. You can only trot out the old material so much before it becomes stale.bman wrote:It'll be Ritual Plus Ocean, Just BC, and Jane Says probably! Ritual plus Whores, Ted, and Ocean would be awesome and well worth $75.