The Jane's Addiction Discussion Forum
http://www.aintnoright.org/
Please enter your date of birth and the confirmation code you received following your initial request.Noonesshocking wrote:KV, do you have a work item number for my request?
Agreed. Very closely followed by the other 3.Adurentibus Spina wrote:That is the worst thing I've ever heard come out of Perry's mouth. Paul is the worst Beatle in every way that matters.Perry Faked A British Accent Farrell wrote:I was so influenced by Paul McCartney
What does Paul have to do with it?someguy wrote:9/11... Pretty AwfUL
....OH MY GOD
He always seemed so sincereGeorge was the best, even if he believed in pseudo-Eastern gibberish. If you could combine George with something more caustic... I think you'd have a perfect artist, for my taste. Basically, Nina Hagen, but less theatrics and more depth.Romeo wrote:Well I can see where Perry would identify with Paul.
Paul also stuck his no talent wife into his act.
BTW my favorite Beatle was George.
They could take a sad song... and make it better...Mescal wrote:What's so special about the Beatles anyway.
Adurentibus Spina wrote:They could take a sad song... and make it better...Mescal wrote:What's so special about the Beatles anyway.
Here's when I destroy any shred of credibility I may have had left:Mescal wrote:What's so special about the Beatles anyway.
I respect all of them a lot, but I don't like the majority of their work...selected songs like my favorite Across the universe onlySix7Six7 wrote:Here's when I destroy any shred of credibility I may have had left:Mescal wrote:What's so special about the Beatles anyway.
I don't like The Beatles.
The torturing methods are having to listen to any of her "music" while wearing headphonesMescal wrote:Yeah, she's using John's heritage to fund Al Qaida.
And she helped them developing new torturing methods
hey that pseudo-Eastern gibberish kept him grounded. IMO At least he was sincere about it....Adurentibus Spina wrote:George was the best, even if he believed in pseudo-Eastern gibberish. If you could combine George with something more caustic... I think you'd have a perfect artist, for my taste. Basically, Nina Hagen, but less theatrics and more depth.Romeo wrote:Well I can see where Perry would identify with Paul.
Paul also stuck his no talent wife into his act.
BTW my favorite Beatle was George.
Yeah I get that he was sincere about it, but it was lame, and every time I watch an old interview with him I want to scream out "Just shut the fuck up and play guitar!" because the stuff he'd say was half obvious, half brain-dead nonsense (sorta like Perry Farrell, but George was a better song-writer, solo.)Romeo wrote:hey that pseudo-Eastern gibberish kept him grounded. IMO At least he was sincere about it....Adurentibus Spina wrote:George was the best, even if he believed in pseudo-Eastern gibberish. If you could combine George with something more caustic... I think you'd have a perfect artist, for my taste. Basically, Nina Hagen, but less theatrics and more depth.Romeo wrote:Well I can see where Perry would identify with Paul.
Paul also stuck his no talent wife into his act.
BTW my favorite Beatle was George.
But Here comes the sun, Something & while my guitar gently weeps.....
Agreed. They deserve respect, but as for making decent music? It's not everyone's bag and you shouldn't have to like it because society tells you so. Little Richard did more for rock n roll than the Beatles ever did. I tried listening to Sgt. Peppers for the third time ever the other week. You know, the older you get, the more appreciative you are..And I still never made it to side 2. Whatever floats your boat, innit.Matz wrote:I respect all of them a lot, but I don't like the majority of their work...selected songs like my favorite Across the universe onlySix7Six7 wrote:Here's when I destroy any shred of credibility I may have had left:Mescal wrote:What's so special about the Beatles anyway.
I don't like The Beatles.