Aint No Right

Pandemonium wrote:

Larry B. wrote:No, but I saw three buildings come down and was given explanations that make absolutely no sense according to the laws of the universe.

Yay, I get to use my favorite GIF again!

Didn't you get the memo? Among other things, LarryB has intuited the laws of the universe such that he's able to determine when explanations make "absolutely no sense" -- especially in cases like this one where somehow everyone else is under the mistaken belief that these explanations do make sense...

Adurentibus Spina wrote:

Pandemonium wrote:

Larry B. wrote:No, but I saw three buildings come down and was given explanations that make absolutely no sense according to the laws of the universe.

Yay, I get to use my favorite GIF again!

Didn't you get the memo? Among other things, LarryB has intuited the laws of the universe such that he's able to determine when explanations make "absolutely no sense" -- especially in cases like this one where somehow everyone else is under the mistaken belief that these explanations do make sense...

I don't believe "most of the American people" is the same as "everyone else." We haven't been fed all their propaganda. There are literally thousands of professionals who work in architecture and demolition and physics, all around the world, who have actually organized to explain what laws of the universe are being broken by the official explanation.

The official version does make sense if you believe in it beforehand. When you see and understand the difference between a building "falling down" (which has hardly ever happened in human history, by the way) and a building being demolished, it becomes obvious.

But anyway, Kurt is better than Perry and Perry is a moron.

Larry... there aren't thousands of reputable people claiming 9/11 was a conspiracy. There's no mystery about how a building could fall like that from being hit by a plane. In fact, believing that the towers fell from controlled demolitions is crazier than just believing a single conspiracy, since the claim can't just be "buildings don't fall like that", but that the conspirators somehow managed to pull off a conspiracy of this magnitude while NOT thinking that all the people who looked at the footage afterwards wouldn't say: "Hey, that looks like a controlled demolition." That's literally the opposite effect of what conspirators would attempt to produce if they did try to make it a controlled demolition. This isn't difficult to understand.

You make me sad.

Larry B. wrote:You make me sad.

Good. You should be sad.

Adurentibus Spina wrote:

Larry B. wrote:You make me sad.

Good. You should be sad.

And you should be smarter.

SEpT. 11Th... a sad daY

That spells out Etty.... OH MY GOD

someguy wrote:SEpT. 11Th... a sad daY

That spells out Etty.... OH MY GOD

YOU CRACKED THE CASE!

Honestly, a fruitless idiotic half-conversation with Larry is more interesting than Perry Farrell's "New Mystery Project", and I couldn't resist pushing him a bit... but obviously both are a waste of time, and far less interesting than... pretty much everything else.

someguy wrote:SEpT. 11Th... a sad daY

That spells out Etty.... OH MY GOD

sePtEmbeR 11th is a veRrY sad day

creep wrote:

someguy wrote:SEpT. 11Th... a sad daY

That spells out Etty.... OH MY GOD

sePtEmbeR 11th is a veRrY sad day

September 11th is a verY sAd daY

Don't you guys get it?! When a building is hit by an airplane, it's supposed to fall over like a tree! You guys are so dumb.

Perhaps Larry is just an asshole that needs more education about the laws of physics.

KV, do you have a work item number for my request?

Noonesshocking wrote:KV, do you have a work item number for my request?

Please enter your date of birth and the confirmation code you received following your initial request.

If the request is not handled expeditiously, I would escalate to a team leader.

Adurentibus Spina wrote:

Perry Faked A British Accent Farrell wrote:I was so influenced by Paul McCartney

That is the worst thing I've ever heard come out of Perry's mouth. Paul is the worst Beatle in every way that matters.

Agreed. Very closely followed by the other 3.

9/11... Pretty AwfUL

....OH MY GOD

I think, right now... this is both the worst and best thread on ANR...

someguy wrote:9/11... Pretty AwfUL

....OH MY GOD

What does Paul have to do with it?

Paul is dead. The current Paul is an imposter. Therefore the US Government blew up the twin towers (but not the Pentagon or that other plane, for some reason...), and Perry Farrell sucks.

Well I can see where Perry would identify with Paul.

Paul also stuck his no talent wife into his act.



BTW my favorite Beatle was George. He always seemed so sincere

Romeo wrote:Well I can see where Perry would identify with Paul.

Paul also stuck his no talent wife into his act.



BTW my favorite Beatle was George. He always seemed so sincere

George was the best, even if he believed in pseudo-Eastern gibberish. If you could combine George with something more caustic... I think you'd have a perfect artist, for my taste. Basically, Nina Hagen, but less theatrics and more depth.

Someone had a hilarious take on choosing your favorite Beatle over at another forum that I frequent. It was something along the lines of: pretentious people pick George, ignorant people pick John, and sociopaths pick Ringo