Aint No Right

hokahey wrote:

Hyperbolic wrote:

hokahey wrote:Good looking out Creep.

yours truly,
Pat Hiscock.

That sucks if it sounds that way.

Dude... seriously, this is the funniest chain of posts ever.

Larry B. wrote:

hokahey wrote:

Hyperbolic wrote:

hokahey wrote:Good looking out Creep.

yours truly,
Pat Hiscock.

That sucks if it sounds that way.

Dude... seriously, this is the funniest chain of posts ever.

I laughed so hard I peed myself.

Always,

Miss Behavin

Speaking of Pugs. Just recently had a litter

Juana wrote:

Speaking of Pugs. Just recently had a litter

So, you have house full of pug puppies?

All puppies are cute, but pug puppies are especially cute. If you don't mind could you post a few pics of their bums?
Puppy bums are too cute the way they waddle around.

Yeah the other half needs to upload more of them (she's in charge of the Pugs, I'm in charge of the Pits and Presa) she's the one who breeds. We're actually giving a couple away to some people that couldn't meet the price but they really wanted to get one for their kids and one for their parents and we thought that was nice.

Human... selling... animals... must... restrain self... verbal attack...

Larry B. wrote:Human... selling... animals... must... restrain self... verbal attack...

Larry the asking price is typically all the medical care, food and if they want breeding rights. If they don't want breeding rights then we only recoup the monies spent on vet and food costs. But typically people want the papers on them as well and that is when we charge. If its going to be a pet home then fine but if they want papers and breeding rights they have to pay extra.

Juana wrote:

Larry B. wrote:Human... selling... animals... must... restrain self... verbal attack...

Larry the asking price is typically all the medical care, food and if they want breeding rights. If they don't want breeding rights then we only recoup the monies spent on vet and food costs. But typically people want the papers on them as well and that is when we charge. If its going to be a pet home then fine but if they want papers and breeding rights they have to pay extra.

...as it should be.

Hoka, Creep ( ) are you emulating the 5 minute rule for edits on posts

Bad call.

SR wrote:Hoka, Creep ( ) are you emulating the 5 minute rule for edits on posts

Bad call.

it's set to 30 minutes

Its more fun to not edit when people are drunk innerwebbin

ya but then the board owner gets all pissy when "someone" calls-> (rhymes with eddie) a ->( rhymes with bunt) and can't edit the post...next thing you know we're all back at mikes tring to get the address to whores version 8.35

kv wrote:ya but then the board owner gets all pissy when "someone" calls-> (rhymes with eddie) a ->( rhymes with bunt) and can't edit the post...next thing you know we're all back at mikes tring to get the address to whores version 8.35

Well shit happens I supposed, hypothetically I would imagine that with "someone's" comment or not we would have eventually been looking for Whores V 8.35

oh no doubt...he was lit to pop and nobody was gonna stop...

Don't stop till you get enough

Satansgopherboy wrote:'
i also love the word cunt

I suppose it depends on it's use, but most women find it highly offensive in my experience so I'd suggest not using it. Sonny let things go a little too far in this regard and then he snapped. I'd rather be a big bad mean forum admin than have a board no one wants to post at because of the childish BS.

hokahey wrote:

Satansgopherboy wrote:'
i also love the word cunt

I suppose it depends on it's use, but most women find it highly offensive in my experience so I'd suggest not using it.

Why not just say see you next Tuesday?

Bandit72 wrote:

hokahey wrote:

Satansgopherboy wrote:'
i also love the word cunt

I suppose it depends on it's use, but most women find it highly offensive in my experience so I'd suggest not using it.

Why not just say see you next Tuesday?

C U Next Tuesday

or "see you next Tuesday, cunt".

You coming over?

I am not overly offended by the word.
However I do suspect any man who needs to use it a lot in reference to women is definitely a misogynist

You were close, but actually, the best use is this:

Heh, I never bothered to keep up on this particular thread the past week or so until this evening. Now I get the sensitivity to the dreaded c-word when I used it in the Ozzy/Black Sabbath thread.

That said, I still think no words should be "unacceptable" so long as they're not directed at other members of this board or not used to purposely and directly offend another member.

Pandemonium wrote:That said, I still think no words should be "unacceptable" so long as they're not directed at other members of this board or not used to purposely and directly offend another member.

I have to disagree. Some words are extremely offensive to certain groups of people. I've seen what happens on a board that tries to experiment with too much freedom. It turns in to a pretty terrible place to visit.