Porno?

Discussion regarding Jane's Addiction news and associated projects
Message
Author
Hokahey
Site Admin
Posts: 5518
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: Porno?

#126 Post by Hokahey » Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:36 pm

NYRexall wrote:Are people still holding out hope for a new P4P album? It doesn't make sense.

There's no money in that venture, and Perry has to know this. People won't buy tickets to see Jane's anymore, let alone their latest album. What makes you think there's interest in a new P4P album/tour?
They posted pics of them in the studio.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Porno?

#127 Post by Juana » Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:39 pm

NYRexall wrote:Are people still holding out hope for a new P4P album? It doesn't make sense.
This is why
pete wrote:I have read every single post in this thread. I love Etty and I think she is gangster. Perry sounds great in these new songs. The mojo is a gift. I will do my best to keep it real. Love & Respect...Pete
Watt also confirmed there was recording being done

User avatar
NYRexall
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:47 am

Re: Porno?

#128 Post by NYRexall » Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:35 am

Okay, so there's new music being made, but why do you/they think there's interest in another P4P album/tour?

I went back through this thread and here's some of the enthusiasm I found:
hokahey wrote:Really trying to keep my expectations low.
blackula wrote:My last live porno experiance was pets and Tahitian moon with nuno's replacement in satellite party. I'd like to replace that with something more in line with my 90's memories cuz that shit was aweful.
Warped wrote:no hopes that this will be something good.
Pandemonium wrote:I'm looking forward to The P4P equivalent of Strays later this year.
Six7Six7 wrote: i doubt this is going to be an album.
hokahey wrote: You'd think these guys would be a bit more forthcoming w/ info considering 99% of people couldn't care less and whatever it is won't sell more than a few copies.
kv wrote: as long as perry is in lots bad can happen...hell had janes in full back together what happened? nothing!
Kajicat wrote:Fuck the new Porno!
Eric B. wrote:Don't get your hopes up high. Although most of you around here think the other Porno-members were capable of getting some magic out of Perry, I'm of a different opinion. An ok band, but nothing magical.
Martyn LeNoble ‏@martynlenoble 7m
.“@perryfarrell: Such enthusiasm for PFP. Such that I'm considering going out live.Yes?" 2 replies...no need to say more.
blackula wrote:I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage.
kv wrote:i would much rather see hellride doing stooges covers then porno in 2013 with perry fucking it up along with his cunt wife on the stage
Larry B. wrote:chuck me in the "Not excited" list.
feathers mcgraw wrote:I can't see a PFP record happening, no matter how much Perry talks about it. It wouldn't be a big enough draw, commercially.
kv wrote:just because watt and pete will play solid doesn't mean perry won't fuck it up
So yea, I'd say some people are excited and a whole lot more aren't :noclue:

Hokahey
Site Admin
Posts: 5518
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: Porno?

#129 Post by Hokahey » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:35 am

NYRexall wrote:Okay, so there's new music being made, but why do you/they think there's interest in another P4P album/tour?

I went back through this thread and here's some of the enthusiasm I found:
hokahey wrote:Really trying to keep my expectations low.
blackula wrote:My last live porno experiance was pets and Tahitian moon with nuno's replacement in satellite party. I'd like to replace that with something more in line with my 90's memories cuz that shit was aweful.
Warped wrote:no hopes that this will be something good.
Pandemonium wrote:I'm looking forward to The P4P equivalent of Strays later this year.
Six7Six7 wrote: i doubt this is going to be an album.
hokahey wrote: You'd think these guys would be a bit more forthcoming w/ info considering 99% of people couldn't care less and whatever it is won't sell more than a few copies.
kv wrote: as long as perry is in lots bad can happen...hell had janes in full back together what happened? nothing!
Kajicat wrote:Fuck the new Porno!
Eric B. wrote:Don't get your hopes up high. Although most of you around here think the other Porno-members were capable of getting some magic out of Perry, I'm of a different opinion. An ok band, but nothing magical.
Martyn LeNoble ‏@martynlenoble 7m
.“@perryfarrell: Such enthusiasm for PFP. Such that I'm considering going out live.Yes?" 2 replies...no need to say more.
blackula wrote:I don't want to see Hollywood Perry performing these songs with his wife on stage.
kv wrote:i would much rather see hellride doing stooges covers then porno in 2013 with perry fucking it up along with his cunt wife on the stage
Larry B. wrote:chuck me in the "Not excited" list.
feathers mcgraw wrote:I can't see a PFP record happening, no matter how much Perry talks about it. It wouldn't be a big enough draw, commercially.
kv wrote:just because watt and pete will play solid doesn't mean perry won't fuck it up
So yea, I'd say some people are excited and a whole lot more aren't :noclue:
Great. Well thanks for being on top of it. I'd say it's official. More people are not excited than are excited for potential new P4P. Glad we finally have that settled.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Porno?

#130 Post by Juana » Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:16 am

Hey have to hold out some hope it will be respectable

User avatar
Matz
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:58 am
Location: Denmark

Re: Porno?

#131 Post by Matz » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:39 pm

so an album will materialize with a 100% certainty? haven't really followed this too closely. If yes it sucks, leave P4P untarnished please now that you've fuckd everything else up so bad

User avatar
NYRexall
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:47 am

Re: Porno?

#132 Post by NYRexall » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:01 pm

hokahey wrote: Great. Well thanks for being on top of it. I'd say it's official. More people are not excited than are excited for potential new P4P. Glad we finally have that settled.
Oh c'mon; I was just having a little fun.

Honestly, I wouldn't be adverse to a new P4P album. So long as the sequined doofus doesn't screw it up for everyone.

embrace_the_darkness
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:30 am

Re: Porno?

#133 Post by embrace_the_darkness » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:17 pm

I'm actually way more excited about new p4p music than janes.

Pete said they've have a 3rd album written for years.

Agua is also a great song so bring it on.

I will physically harm Perry's 'engineering gerbil' blumpy if he fucks porno like he fucked janes though.

trevor ayer
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:44 am

Re: Porno?

#134 Post by trevor ayer » Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:06 pm

maybe they will add some cool NIN influenced computer blips .. then you can all cream your computer screens over it after all :nod:

User avatar
Pandemonium
Posts: 5725
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: Porno?

#135 Post by Pandemonium » Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:17 pm

trevor ayer wrote:maybe they will add some cool NIN influenced computer blips .. then you can all cream your computer screens over it after all :nod:
At least we'll have some poop left over for the Trevor ultra-poppin' remix.

trevor ayer
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:44 am

Re: Porno?

#136 Post by trevor ayer » Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:27 pm

i'm sure you have an endless supply .. ur hardly on empty

User avatar
JOEinPHX
Posts: 6708
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:55 pm
Location: The Sea

Re: Porno?

#137 Post by JOEinPHX » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:08 am

trevor ayer wrote:maybe they will add some cool NIN influenced computer blips .. then you can all cream your computer screens over it after all :nod:
Why use NIN influenced computer blips? Perry is mastering the art of C&C Music Factory style EVERYTHING.

This even looks like a video he'd make:



Image

User avatar
Pandemonium
Posts: 5725
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: Porno?

#138 Post by Pandemonium » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:06 am

trevor ayer wrote:i'm sure you have an endless supply .. ur hardly on empty
Image

User avatar
NYRexall
Posts: 842
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:47 am

Re: Porno?

#139 Post by NYRexall » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:20 am

^^^ :lol: ^^^

Jammyshill
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Porno?

#140 Post by Jammyshill » Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:29 am

trevor ayer wrote:maybe they will add some cool NIN influenced computer blips .. then you can all cream your computer screens over it after all :nod:
Your remixes are embarrassing, and unknown to anybody outside of this forum, yet every day you go on the internet to slag off Trent Reznor and his creative/ production outputs? You're the definition of 'internet loser.'

User avatar
Hype
Posts: 7028
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Porno?

#141 Post by Hype » Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:53 am


creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: Porno?

#142 Post by creep » Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:54 pm

:banana:
Martyn LeNoble ‏@martynlenoble 3h

.“@eldude1277: @martynlenoble is there a p4p album coming in 2013 or in the future?”

I don't know,but if so it certainly won't have me on it

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Porno?

#143 Post by Juana » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:04 pm

creep wrote::banana:
Martyn LeNoble ‏@martynlenoble 3h

.“@eldude1277: @martynlenoble is there a p4p album coming in 2013 or in the future?”

I don't know,but if so it certainly won't have me on it
We knew Martyn had nothing to do with the recording, Watt confirmed he is doing the bass on the recordings

creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: Porno?

#144 Post by creep » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:13 pm

Juana wrote:
creep wrote::banana:
Martyn LeNoble ‏@martynlenoble 3h

.“@eldude1277: @martynlenoble is there a p4p album coming in 2013 or in the future?”

I don't know,but if so it certainly won't have me on it
We knew Martyn had nothing to do with the recording, Watt confirmed he is doing the bass on the recordings
i know. i just enjoy how he is adamant about never playing with perry again.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Porno?

#145 Post by Juana » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:16 pm

Oh yeah I do think the level of well hate that people (especially bass players) have for him after dealing with him is pretty hilarious.

clickie
Posts: 4070
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:15 am

Re: Porno?

#146 Post by clickie » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:17 pm

I know some of you guys think Watt was the perfect fit for PFP, but without Martyn theyre just a cover band.

creep
Site Admin
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:51 am

Re: Porno?

#147 Post by creep » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:20 pm

i don't like watt in p4p either. martyn was also the second best fit in jane's.

User avatar
Juana
Posts: 5269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:52 pm

Re: Porno?

#148 Post by Juana » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:45 pm

clickie wrote:I know some of you guys think Watt was the perfect fit for PFP, but without Martyn theyre just a cover band.
This is what we're left with so I'm being open to the fact that it might not suck.

User avatar
Hype
Posts: 7028
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:44 pm

Re: Porno?

#149 Post by Hype » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:51 pm

Pete's guitar will be fun/good, and Perk is always competent, if not always interesting... so it's really not about whether the sounds made by the musicians will be any good, but whether the songwriting/lyrics/vocals will be passable enough not to make the entire experience excruciating (cf. Strays).

clickie
Posts: 4070
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:15 am

Re: Porno?

#150 Post by clickie » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:55 pm

The original sound of pfp was built around Perrys sharp voice and lyrics that cut right through like a razor, I want that skeletal sound back where Perrys voice leads the way.

Post Reply