Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
and someone with some computer skills can make their own all access pass.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Too funny! I'm DEFINATELY going cold turkey from this site till my shows. Bubba the Clown, Bears, Strippers...this could be a fun show!
- Pandemonium
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Bahh, I was doing the Bear thing when Janes was still playing clubs.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:55 pm
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Jane's Escapist setlist (stolen from JA.org). I like it, but plenty won't...
http://janesaddiction.org/img/tour/2012 ... etlist.jpg
http://janesaddiction.org/img/tour/2012 ... etlist.jpg
-
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Other than ANR, I don't hate it. Woulda preferred SALWOI over Words, though.Jammyshill wrote:Jane's Escapist setlist (stolen from JA.org). I like it, but plenty won't...
http://janesaddiction.org/img/tour/2012 ... etlist.jpg
Let's all just take a minute to thank Etty for allowing Classic Girl and I Would for You into the set. Seriously.
Although I do feel somewhat bad for Casey if she has to hear about this version of JA dusting off songs that were really truly for her, and in many ways, hers. Maybe she'll think it's awesome or stupid, who knows?
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
i'm sure she is flattered. everyone has moved on apparently so it's nice to have songs about you that are still performed.CaseyContrarian wrote:
Although I do feel somewhat bad for Casey if she has to hear about this version of JA dusting off songs that were really truly for her, and in many ways, hers. Maybe she'll think it's awesome or stupid, who knows?
i also agree that anr needs to go.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Ouch. No.CaseyContrarian wrote:Other than ANR, I don't hate it. Woulda preferred SALWOI...Jammyshill wrote:Jane's Escapist setlist (stolen from JA.org). I like it, but plenty won't...
http://janesaddiction.org/img/tour/2012 ... etlist.jpg
Just call it "Splash" haha
Thank you Etty.Let's all just take a minute to thank Etty for allowing Classic Girl and I Would for You into the set. Seriously.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Yeah the set list isn't terrible I want them to play a local show now but I can always fly to LA for one too
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Just watched this clip of Twisted Tales. I don't usually get into the Perry slagging but t's lame that he isn't even really singing the recorded melody on the new tracks and the backing tracks are lame. I was pretty impressed but the setlist that was posted and was almost thinking I might check if there was show near me coming up but then I watched this clip.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
If that's 'the best frontman in the world'... god fucking save us. I've seen drunk librarians singing with more charisma in a fucking karaoke. And you're right, that backing track is lame. The guy couldn't sing for shit.ant wrote:Just watched this clip of Twisted Tales. I don't usually get into the Perry slagging but t's lame that he isn't even really singing the recorded melody on the new tracks and the backing tracks are lame. I was pretty impressed but the setlist that was posted and was almost thinking I might check if there was show near me coming up but then I watched this clip.
- Deconstruction
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:57 pm
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Glad I got to at least see Jane's in 2009 before the lip sync era started. Fucking EMBARASSING, the media needs to call Perry out on it as do fans. I'd rather hear Perry sing like shit (which he does in the verses here) than THAT.ant wrote:Just watched this clip of Twisted Tales. I don't usually get into the Perry slagging but t's lame that he isn't even really singing the recorded melody on the new tracks and the backing tracks are lame. I was pretty impressed but the setlist that was posted and was almost thinking I might check if there was show near me coming up but then I watched this clip.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
i just don't think he can do it. I think all the years of banshee screaming have left his voice decimated.
He doesn't even try on the first night of the tour while his voice is perfectly rested. What's going to happen after the 2nd or 3rd date in a row?
He doesn't even try on the first night of the tour while his voice is perfectly rested. What's going to happen after the 2nd or 3rd date in a row?
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:38 am
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
CaseyContrarian wrote:Other than ANR, I don't hate it. Woulda preferred SALWOI over Words, though.Jammyshill wrote:Jane's Escapist setlist (stolen from JA.org). I like it, but plenty won't...
http://janesaddiction.org/img/tour/2012 ... etlist.jpg
Let's all just take a minute to thank Etty for allowing Classic Girl and I Would for You into the set. Seriously.
Although I do feel somewhat bad for Casey if she has to hear about this version of JA dusting off songs that were really truly for her, and in many ways, hers. Maybe she'll think it's awesome or stupid, who knows?
wow dude! you are really out of the line here. he wrote the fucking songs. how come a girl he was fucking at the time, even if she was somewhat of a muse and inspiration for him would ever dream of these songs being hers? how fucked up can you be?
i mean WTF people? when i read opinions like this one i really think this community isn't of fans anymore but of fucked up resentful douchebags who nurture some imagined mid 1990 vision of jane's that is no more and to be hones never existed even back then! let it go dude, you are sick!
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Hi everyone. Haven't logged on for a while...
No, don't mind me, i'm just here to see the rerun of the "eat shit and die" episode. one of my favs
No, don't mind me, i'm just here to see the rerun of the "eat shit and die" episode. one of my favs
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
You're right.janesbiggestfan wrote:some imagined mid 1990 vision of jane's that is no more and to be hones never existed even back then!
That's it.
It was all just mass hysteria. There was never a band. They were all rumors. There never was a relapse, because there was no addiction in the first place. All those shows? Just an empty stage and a few thousands of freaks jumping as an act of catharsis.
Thank you. I'm calling my shrinks right now, I don't need them anymore. Life is good now.
Life is good.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:38 am
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Larry B. wrote:You're right.janesbiggestfan wrote:some imagined mid 1990 vision of jane's that is no more and to be hones never existed even back then!
That's it.
It was all just mass hysteria. There was never a band. They were all rumors. There never was a relapse, because there was no addiction in the first place. All those shows? Just an empty stage and a few thousands of freaks jumping as an act of catharsis.
Thank you. I'm calling my shrinks right now, I don't need them anymore. Life is good now.
Life is good.
You can try reducing it to absurd, but it's really fucked up that on a JA board, a good 1/3 of the people are hateful, resentful bitches that shit on the band no matter what they do. Don't get me wrong. Hate all you want. But why come here? Why ruin what is still precious to us, who love the band still? Dont shit where we still eat assholes!
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
as a longtime lurker you should know by now how people are here, so quit your kvetching.janesbiggestfan wrote:Larry B. wrote:You're right.janesbiggestfan wrote:some imagined mid 1990 vision of jane's that is no more and to be hones never existed even back then!
That's it.
It was all just mass hysteria. There was never a band. They were all rumors. There never was a relapse, because there was no addiction in the first place. All those shows? Just an empty stage and a few thousands of freaks jumping as an act of catharsis.
Thank you. I'm calling my shrinks right now, I don't need them anymore. Life is good now.
Life is good.
You can try reducing it to absurd, but it's really fucked up that on a JA board, a good 1/3 of the people are hateful, resentful bitches that shit on the band no matter what they do. Don't get me wrong. Hate all you want. But why come here? Why ruin what is still precious to us, who love the band still? Dont shit where we still eat assholes!
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Current Jane's Addiction fans don't eat here. They can eat at ja.com or ja.org. This is where the JA community eats. Our liking of the band is hard to explain because it's closely related to a wide range of time-space conditions. You have to experience it to understand it. We came together because of them, and we grew from there. We grew beyond them. So fuck you.janesbiggestfan wrote: You can try reducing it to absurd, but it's really fucked up that on a JA board, a good 1/3 of the people are hateful, resentful bitches that shit on the band no matter what they do. Don't get me wrong. Hate all you want. But why come here? Why ruin what is still precious to us, who love the band still? Dont shit where we still eat assholes!
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:38 am
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Yes i should have known better. But after what they have done, new setlist, old songs redeemed, almost half of new album played live to see this response is flabbergasting. I mean fuck me! What else could they have done? Jane's just can't do right for some here. Oh right I know, Perry should be 20 years younger and on heroin, maybe then the naysayers would give him a fucking breakArtemis wrote: as a longtime lurker you should know by now how people are here, so quit your kvetching.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
I agree that some people wish the band were frozen in time so to speak, but I think most people understand the band memebers are older, have wives, children, and other interests. I think people hold them to a high standard and are disappointed when they don't meet that standard. I think there have been postive comments too, not only critical ones.janesbiggestfan wrote:Yes i should have known better. But after what they have done, new setlist, old songs redeemed, almost half of new album played live to see this response is flabbergasting. I mean fuck me! What else could they have done? Jane's just can't do right for some here. Oh right I know, Perry should be 20 years younger and on heroin, maybe then the naysayers would give him a fucking breakArtemis wrote: as a longtime lurker you should know by now how people are here, so quit your kvetching.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
That's it.Artemis wrote:I agree that some people wish the band were frozen in time so to speak, but I think most people understand the band memebers are older, have wives, children, and other interests. I think people hold them to a high standard and are disappointed when they don't meet that standard. I think there have been postive comments too, not only critical ones.janesbiggestfan wrote:Yes i should have known better. But after what they have done, new setlist, old songs redeemed, almost half of new album played live to see this response is flabbergasting. I mean fuck me! What else could they have done? Jane's just can't do right for some here. Oh right I know, Perry should be 20 years younger and on heroin, maybe then the naysayers would give him a fucking breakArtemis wrote: as a longtime lurker you should know by now how people are here, so quit your kvetching.
The complaining about the setlist is indeed annoying. They changed it - and for their standards it was a major change. Bitching about that is really not justified.
Oh and Casey commented on fb "Great setlist...i must say..."
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Voila, everybody happy!Warped wrote:That's it.Artemis wrote:I agree that some people wish the band were frozen in time so to speak, but I think most people understand the band memebers are older, have wives, children, and other interests. I think people hold them to a high standard and are disappointed when they don't meet that standard. I think there have been postive comments too, not only critical ones.janesbiggestfan wrote:Yes i should have known better. But after what they have done, new setlist, old songs redeemed, almost half of new album played live to see this response is flabbergasting. I mean fuck me! What else could they have done? Jane's just can't do right for some here. Oh right I know, Perry should be 20 years younger and on heroin, maybe then the naysayers would give him a fucking breakArtemis wrote: as a longtime lurker you should know by now how people are here, so quit your kvetching.
The complaining about the setlist is indeed annoying. They changed it - and for their standards it was a major change. Bitching about that is really not justified.
Oh and Casey commented on fb "Great setlist...i must say..."
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Hell must be trying to recapture your youth every night on a stage.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
More like trying to live up to your own hype onstage every night.ESY wrote:Hell must be trying to recapture your youth every night on a stage.
Re: Jane's - 1.5 Hour Set Length/No Recording
Well, I have to say, that as a 38 yr old fan that has been around since almost the beginning, it's very sad to watch. Mostly because, I really did think that PF was bigger than a nostalgia act and even bigger that JA. The name Janes Addiction used to be bigger than rock itself. Now it means flogged nostalgia. The name Perry Farrel used to mean art and danger. Now it means a man stumbling about miming to a backing track. It's inexcusable.