Krock Show
Re: Krock Show
Pete being so likable would make it easier to root for them to do well too. Make it easier to digest purchasing tickets etc.
Re: Krock Show
Perry simply cannot perform Janes songs anymore.
What he needs are songs that accent his current voice. Like GGU. PF hasn't pulled off Ain't No Right in years.....
What he needs are songs that accent his current voice. Like GGU. PF hasn't pulled off Ain't No Right in years.....
- Deconstruction
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:57 pm
Re: Krock Show
Maybe if they renamed it "Ain't No Site" he'd put more passion into it.Enron wrote:Perry simply cannot perform Janes songs anymore.
What he needs are songs that accent his current voice. Like GGU. PF hasn't pulled off Ain't No Right in years.....
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Krock Show
Sofa King funny. And true.intertwoven wrote:Somebody start a petition. Or maybe we could pool our money.. I'm sure for the right price they could be persuaded to retire the song.Tyler Durden wrote:I would be more than happy if they never played this song ever again.
Perhaps we could get a corporation to sponsor the song's retirement. I'd sign up for a MasterCard if there was a promotion somehow linked to that song not being performed. I'd sign a long Verizon contract if it meant "Jane Says" wouldn't be played anymore. The band is sitting on a goldmine here!!
Re: Krock Show
I get the feeling Perry just dosent like Janes Addiction. He uses it to make money, and I'm sure he's proud of it on some level. But I'm sure he resents that this is the only thing that most anyone cares about. It shows in the performances and the general lack of any direction. It's there to make money when need be.
TGEA looks more and more like an excuse to keep the name alive. Half an album with an outsider, and half an album with a journey man bass player that didn't stick around... Anything to just simply have a product . Having a CD I'm sure helps book big festivals and tours...without it the offers are probably much less and few and far between.
The more I think about it, Perry's apathy in the performances and such just make me realize he resents having to drag out the corpse of the band over and over and over again.
I bet if he did P4P it would be a 180 degree difference. That at least is HIS own thing. Think he values it more.
TGEA looks more and more like an excuse to keep the name alive. Half an album with an outsider, and half an album with a journey man bass player that didn't stick around... Anything to just simply have a product . Having a CD I'm sure helps book big festivals and tours...without it the offers are probably much less and few and far between.
The more I think about it, Perry's apathy in the performances and such just make me realize he resents having to drag out the corpse of the band over and over and over again.
I bet if he did P4P it would be a 180 degree difference. That at least is HIS own thing. Think he values it more.
Re: Krock Show
yeah just not with Jane'sSix7Six7 wrote:1. Pete deserves to play big shows with big paydays
they are a live party band...they actually do very well and always play to a packed room or festivalSix7Six7 wrote: 2. Lance Herbstrong isn't exactly tearing up the charts...
Pete does not charge for his honesty. Pete does not write music to sell to the masses. Pete's songs are not your typical radio written composition.Pete writes and records in one sitting.Six7Six7 wrote: 3. ...Either are his solo albums
Pete's solo music is filled with love and wisdom. Words to heal and literally change the world!! Maybe just by one soul at a time but it is solid art. It is deep if you are looking to dig deep into life. Pete's solo music makes an impact that last.
I echo everything kv has said!
leave Pete out of Jane's. It shouldn't even be a option. Pete loves Perry and the guys but Pete is his own animal.
Porno For Pyros is very sacred to Pete, it should never be exploited. It is a treasure for few to see and appreciate.
As much as I love both bands with every drop of blood in my body and as much as I love all the members I would NEVER want the two to combined. They both deserve to be special in their own way
Re: Krock Show
I agree, and I hope they don't do a reunion, leave it alone, untarnished as someone said regarding this a while ago.ragdoll wrote:Six7Six7 wrote:
As much as I love both bands with every drop of blood in my body and as much as I love all the members I would NEVER want the two to combined. They both deserve to be special in their own way
Re: Krock Show
Are you saying Jane's is being or has been exploited?ragdoll wrote:leave Pete out of Jane's. It shouldn't even be a option. Pete loves Perry and the guys but Pete is his own animal.
Porno For Pyros is very sacred to Pete, it should never be exploited:
Re: Krock Show
yeah, Id say I think there have been times where Jane's has been exploited and I really think it falls on the management not the band.SR wrote:Are you saying Jane's is being or has been exploited?ragdoll wrote:leave Pete out of Jane's. It shouldn't even be a option. Pete loves Perry and the guys but Pete is his own animal.
Porno For Pyros is very sacred to Pete, it should never be exploited:
Re: Krock Show
i can't wait to see what we're all saying in 10 years.
Re: Krock Show
Nuno and Stephen were on fire last night! I miss the days of when Perry only relied on a backing track; he can't even lip sync well.Six7Six7 wrote:i can't wait to see what we're all saying in 10 years.
P.S. I bought the Rhino remasters of Nothing's Shocking and Ritual on iTunes today. Perry having Chaney re-record all of Eric's bass lines is an all time low for this band.
Re: Krock Show
Are you serious? Did he really have this done? He is such a small, small man.Tyler Durden wrote: Perry having Chaney re-record all of Eric's bass lines is an all time low for this band.
Re: Krock Show
I believe that was a joke
Re: Krock Show
niceTyler Durden wrote:Nuno and Stephen were on fire last night! I miss the days of when Perry only relied on a backing track; he can't even lip sync well.Six7Six7 wrote:i can't wait to see what we're all saying in 10 years.
P.S. I bought the Rhino remasters of Nothing's Shocking and Ritual on iTunes today. Perry having Chaney re-record all of Eric's bass lines is an all time low for this band.
Re: Krock Show
Good, jokes on me too then.Matz wrote: I believe that was a joke
I'm no intellectual property or copyright expert, but I can see fathom him doing this to lift the financial obligation to EA...even partially....which of course speaks volumes of what I think of the man.
Re: Krock Show
i don't know if they could actually do it.
It's not like Ozzy's band that were just hired guns for the album and Ozzy was the one with the record deal.
Eric signed on the dotted line with the rest of the band for that album.
It's not like Ozzy's band that were just hired guns for the album and Ozzy was the one with the record deal.
Eric signed on the dotted line with the rest of the band for that album.
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Krock Show
It's not the record deal that matters -- it's the publishing. Perry could never do a re-record as long as EA controls some part of the composition copyrights.Six7Six7 wrote:i don't know if they could actually do it.
It's not like Ozzy's band that were just hired guns for the album and Ozzy was the one with the record deal.
Eric signed on the dotted line with the rest of the band for that album.
Re: Krock Show
Boom. Solved.
Good to know.
But wait... how did Perry get away with using Jane's songs for PFP? And for Kettle Whistle?
Good to know.
But wait... how did Perry get away with using Jane's songs for PFP? And for Kettle Whistle?
- Pandemonium
- Posts: 5725
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: Krock Show
Well, he could, but Eric would still collect publishing royalties. He would lose performance royalties. The current situation with Janes vs Ozzy's (original) solo band is actually a bit more similar than you think. Although everyone in Ozzy's original "Blizzard of Ozz" band was a "hired gun," they also all participated in writing and performing those tunes and had joint publishing. Ozzy owns the brand name and copyright, but the original band members who wrote the music together still share publishing royalties even if they likely don't have a vote how the classic songs are used (or abused) in say, car commercials.CaseyContrarian wrote:It's not the record deal that matters -- it's the publishing. Perry could never do a re-record as long as EA controls some part of the composition copyrights.Six7Six7 wrote:i don't know if they could actually do it.
It's not like Ozzy's band that were just hired guns for the album and Ozzy was the one with the record deal.
Eric signed on the dotted line with the rest of the band for that album.
I don't know the details of how Perry owns a majority stake in the "Janes" brand these days but he theoretically pull the same stunt which would have the same effect on Eric or anyone else in the band he decided to replace. Eric would still get publishing *and* performance royalties from airplay/use of the original songs but he would not get performance (he'd still get publishing) royalties from newly re-recorded versions. Anyone in the band (or not, such as a cover band) who moves on to their next band can play the songs live but they (legally) have to pay whatever the small royalty to ASCAP who distributes the fee to the proper artists responsible for creating the song.
On this topic, Axl Rose re-recorded the entire Appetite For Destruction album around 2001 to cut off performance royalties from his former bandmates but for whatever reasons, the album was never released.
Re: Krock Show
Six7Six7 wrote:Boom. Solved.
Good to know.
But wait... how did Perry get away with using Jane's songs for PFP? And for Kettle Whistle?
I believe in the Xiola interview he mentioned things like that and how legally he could put up a fight but chose not to. He still gets paid for it (songs he recorded being published) but the fight would just be about the use of the songs.